Date: 2009/3/25
Subject: [vedic-astrology] Re: What Jyotish the program considers more precisely?
To: vedic-astrology@yahoogroups.com
Namaste,
 
 I am using Das Goravani's astrology program for many years. I asked  
 him about the precision of astrology computer programs,
 as discussed in the forum, here is what he wrote and he would like me  
 to share his answer with all of you:
 
 My dear Jyotish friends,
 
 Hi, Das Goravani here.  Author of Goravani Jyotish.  I wish to  
 address briefly the discussion regarding softwares.
 
 The question was accuracy, I believe.  To that end let me say the  
 following:
 
 I entered this field assuming that the calculational part of  
 astrology was already nailed down fully.  I researched and found that  
 to be the case.  In other words, the astronomy portion of it was  
 already settled.  In fact, anyone can get ahold of the complete code  
 for Jyotish.  It takes a little effort, there is no one stop shop for  
 it, but it can be gathered, as I did it, so I know.
 
 The main planetary algorithms used these days by most or all of the  
 programs is the code that comes from NASA, the American Space  
 program, as they do share their planetary code freely.  Haven taken  
 this code, it has been then reworked by many in the field, and resold  
 by them individually as THEIR Planetary code.  In fact, planetary  
 code is a complex mathematical encyclopedia, and is really locked  
 down, with occasional tweaks coming out of observations.
 
 OK, then, it gets to you via a programmer who packages it into a  
 useable Jyotish package by adding the Hindu calculations themselves,  
 on top of the planetary code.
 
 There are two parts that are questionable to some degree, and that is  
 the lagna and ayanamsa.  Those are harder, and stranger, due to the  
 shape of the earth, and the latitude issue and how that affects the  
 tilt of the birth against the zodiac.  People born in the North or  
 far South (more rare by far), are "slanted" to the zodiac at birth.   
 That's a real issue nobody talks about.
 
 The major programs all calculate close to each other.  Why not  
 exact?  Because of the life course of the code each of us has in our  
 hands.  Mine came from a certain source, and was in basic at the  
 time.  It was remade into C for me.  My ascendent calc I did myself  
 from a known source book.  My ayanamsa code I got from logic (for  
 straight line) and from a source for the type that tapes the wobble  
 into account, not just the tilt, of the earth.
 
 The major programs all calculate closely.
 
 Nobody present is capable of telling you which is more accurate in  
 terms of calculations.
 
 The only person(s) who could tell you which is more accurate in terms  
 of planetary longitude on the zodiac is someone who is a genuine  
 highly educated and accurate in that area of knowledge FOR SURE RIGHT  
 NOW and that would be a live ASTRONOMER.  No astrologer can speak to  
 that.
 
 Next, in terms of ayanamsa and ascendent, to really discuss that, you  
 would again need an ASTRONOMER.  They hate astrologers, generally.
 
 As for the Hindu calculations in our programs, those are so fixed,  
 there should be little variation, except in Shad Bala and a few other  
 areas where interpretation of classical texts comes into play moreso,  
 and there are some variations of that interpretation.  NONE of the  
 current lot of us programmers are ALSO Sanskrit scholars, so, we rely  
 on the translations that come at us from BV Raman and others, who  
 themselves are not perhaps either, the full scholar.
 
 I really wish to urge everyone to admit who/where they are in the  
 knowledge of exactness when we do raise issues of exactness.
 
 At this point, the programs simply are different, slightly, in  
 minutes and seconds of arc on the Lagna, planets, ayanamsas, because  
 of the little things that happen to code as it goes through it's  
 language journey.  You know, the  handling of fine decimal numbers,  
 there are issues there, that cause computers and languages to  
 calculate slightly differently.  Math, with floating point numbers,  
 is not quite as fixed as we would like.  There have been chips in  
 computers that did things wrong, and languages round differently.
 
 By and by, slowly over time, and this has happened in the base of  
 this field, in the core codes in these programs, that things get  
 shifted ever so slightly, and so, over time, this occurs.  Another  
 way to put it is that some core codes have suffered more in their  
 lifetimes than others, become more rounded off, and it shows up as  
 minutes and second of arc difference.
 
 I do not think any of the current lot of programmers actually has a  
 telescope or actually knows astro physics to any degree, astronomy,  
 etc.  Mostly we are entreprenuers who love Hindu/Vedic stuff, got the  
 code from the astronomy to astrology group that preceded us, put it  
 into a program, struggle to keep it going, and I don't think any of  
 us are rich either.  PL had a huge cash rich partner in India for  
 awhile, but that's over from what I heard though it advanced that  
 program by leaps during that period.  Money does that.  I passed on  
 the guy, he came to me first, due to dharmic reasons surrounding the  
 use of gems.
 
 I think you're barking up the wrong tree.  I smell "investing" when I  
 here "accuracy" to a great degree, and I have to say, what is fixed  
 is, and you will win or not, so keep going, in your karma, because  
 there are so many things you cannot control, just add this to the  
 pile, because your interpretations are gonna be, by human reality, so  
 widely wrong from the truth, that harping on accuracy now is silly.
 
 This same applies to people readers.  You don't need total accuracy.   
 To think so is very skewed.
 
 Trust me, when I or any other programs, NONE of us TRY to be sloppy.   
 In fact, we TRY hard to be accurate, as could be, WITH THE MATERIAL  
 WE ARE SOURCING FROM
 
 All in all, my conclusion, keep the right perspective.  This is a non  
 exact science, one of half heart and half logic.
 
 We cannot do this fully, as that would be to know ALL.  It's  
 impossible.  ALL is in the ONE and we are in it and it is all there  
 is here, and it is all inter twined, which is why we can read it, but  
 ALL of it is readable, not just the planets on the zodiac, but that  
 is what we've nailed so far, or been given, as you believe, as you  
 like.  That's where we are.
 
 Keep perspective.
 
 Ciao
 
 Hari Om
 
 Das Goravani
 
 distribute this freely
 
 Signed,
 
 Das Goravani
 das@goravani.com
 http://www.Goravani.com
 http://YouTube.com/DasGoravani
 
 ...............................
 http://pbase.com/stetsa
 ...............................
 
 We dont see things as they are, we see things as we are.
 Anais Nin